Government Did Not Require Reckless Lending

Don't Believe the Revisionist History Once upon a time, the lending industry was the loudest cheerleader in the subprime lending game, and there were no referees to stop the action. Now industry claims the government made them make millions of reckless mortgages. In fact, today's financial meltdown began with reckless subprime lending that was driven by Wall Street's desire for high-interest loans. Wall Street demanded the loosest underwriting and most dangerous loan products in mortgage history, and there was no will in Washington to stop them. To get the real facts, check out these sources...

CRA is not to Blame for the Mortgage Meltdown

It's time to stop the scapegoating: According to a study by the Federal Reserve, 94% of high-cost loans originated during the housing boom had nothing to do with Community Reinvestment Act goals. Lending to poor didn't spur crisis -Fed's Kroszner The Comptroller of the Currency. John C. Dugan, agrees: "CRA [the Community Reinvestment Act] is not the culprit behind the subprime mortgage lending abuses, or the broader credit quality issues in the marketplace. Indeed, the lenders most prominently associated with subprime mortgage lending abuses and high rates of foreclosure are lenders not...

Wealth-stripping payday loans trouble communities of color

People of color have less wealth than their white counterparts, making them more vulnerable to predatory lending. This, in turn, threatens to further widen the wealth gap. Research from several states suggests that people of color are disproportionately impacted by 400 percent APR payday lending. An examination of payday lending storefront locations in Maricopa and Pima Counties—in which over three-quarters of Arizona payday lenders are located—reveals a pattern of these stores clustering in communities of color. A measure on Arizona's November ballot, Proposition 200, would allow payday...

Bailout: Government's Power to Modify Loans Limited

As Congress considers the $700 billion bailout proposal, some argue that if the government acquires mortgage-backed securities (MBS) that include distressed loans, the government will have the right to modify those loans to prevent foreclosures. Unfortunately, this simply isn't true. Just as corporate bond holders have no right to control the bond issuer's management decisions, so too do MBS holders have no right to control how the trust manages the mortgages. The government will rarely become the owner of individual mortgage loans. 80% of subprime and Alt-A loans are securitized—the types of...

Subprime Loan Foreclosures & Delinquencies versus Lender Workouts

New Foreclosure and Spillover Projections We now project that almost 2.2 million subprime foreclosures will occur primarily in late 2008 through the end of 2009, up from our original 1.1 million estimate made in 2006. Additionally we estimate that 40.6 million homes in neighborhoods surrounding those foreclosures will suffer price declines averaging over $8,667 per home and resulting in a $352 billion total decline in property values. These new projections—representing only property value declines caused by nearby foreclosures, not other price drops associated with the slowdown in local...

Updated Projections of Subprime Foreclosures in the United States and Their Impact on Home Values and Communities

New Foreclosure and Spillover Projections We now project that almost 2.2 million subprime foreclosures will occur primarily in late 2008 through the end of 2009, up from our original 1.1 million estimate made in 2006. Additionally we estimate that 40.6 million homes in neighborhoods surrounding those foreclosures will suffer price declines averaging over $8,667 per home and resulting in a $352 billion total decline in property values. These new projections—representing only property value declines caused by nearby foreclosures, not other price drops associated with the slowdown in local...

The Problem with the Paulson Bailout Plan

Any Real Financial Solution Must Stop Foreclosures The government's proposed bailout plan is a $700 million gift to the financial industry that comes with no accountability and will do nothing to stop millions of foreclosures. Under the Paulson plan, the government will take ownership of bad investments, not individual loans. Consider these facts: An estimated 2.3 million foreclosures will occur in the next two years. One-third (2 million out of 6 million) of borrowers with outstanding subprime loans are delinquent or in foreclosure. 40 million will see their home values decline due to...

Judicial Modification of Loans Would Save 600,000 Homes: Purchase of Securities Will Save None

Proposed financial bailout bill will not help people save their homes. The government proposes to purchase hundreds of billions of dollars of illiquid mortgage-related assets as a response to this country's financial crisis. The vast majority of these assets are securities issued privately through Wall Street that are backed by subprime or Alt A home loans, meaning that the government will own only a portion of these individual home loans. As such, the government will have no ability to modify the underlying loans; there will be dozens of other owners scattered around the globe who would need...

Federal Ownership of Troubled Securities Alone Will Not Stop Foreclosures that Drag Down the Economy

Allowing the Federal government to purchase illiquid mortgage-backed securities (MBS) has been presented as a comprehensive solution to the economic crisis, but it has a serious flaw. This plan will NOT increase loan modifications that prevent foreclosures. Large-scale loan modifications—adjusting the terms of a loan to make it affordable—is the only way to prevent massive foreclosures still ahead. Under the bailout proposal, the government would simply become one of the investors that forecloses on homes. Mortgages are divided into groups owned by hundreds of thousands of interests. The...

High-Cost Payday Lending Traps Arizona Borrowers

Over 700 payday lenders charging up to 459% annual percentage rate (APR) for a two-week loan are located throughout Arizona; with the highest concentrations per capita in Pinal, Mohave, and Maricopa Counties. A typical Arizona borrower pays an estimated $516 in fees for a $325 payday loan and still owes the $325 in principal. Overall, payday lending costs Arizona families nearly $149 million each year. Payday lending drains $91 million and $23 million from Maricopa and Pima County households, respectively. Payday lenders will no longer be able to charge triple-digit interest rates when their...