Amicus Brief

Dear Secretary Duncan, Attorney General Holder, and Director Cordray: As advocates for students, veterans, consumers, civil rights and college access, we write to express grave concerns about the proposed sale of 56 Corinthian Colleges campuses to ECMC Group, a debt collector and loan servicer. We urge you not to waive liability for any prospective buyer of Corinthian campuses unless the sale provides significant relief for current and former students and contains enforceable safeguards to protect students and taxpayers from future abuse. Last year, the publicly traded Corinthian Colleges Inc...

CRL also filed an amicus brief to the New Jersey Supreme Court, advocating for strict compliance with New Jersey's Fair Foreclosure Act and the federal Truth in Lending Act's intentional reordering of the common law rescission process to effectuate Congress's intent that rescission under TILA be a practical tool to save homes from foreclosure. Both statutes play a critical role in preserving homeownership in the face of foreclosure.

This case involves borrowers who purchased a vehicle through a dealership in California. The financial institution in question, Wachovia, did not make the loans, but later purchased the installment contracts from the dealer. When the borrower fell behind on their payments, Wachovia repossessed the cars without properly following California law. California allows self-help repossession, but has strict rules regarding consumers' rights in repossession, including the notices that a creditor must send to consumers.

CRL and the National Consumer Law Center filed an amicus brief supporting appellant Donna Epps in regards to the improper repossession of the appellant's vehicle.

CRL and the National Consumer Law Center filed an amicus brief supporting the Federal Reserve's opposition to a TRO and preliminary injunction that would prevent new mortgage rules from going into effect.

California's Rees-Levering Act entitles car loan borrowers to receive information on the amount they must pay to recover their car when it is repossessed. This represents an important, and easy to satisfy, legal protection for car loan borrowers who otherwise may find it hard to determine the amount of payments and fees the lender claims are owed. U.S. Bank successfully argued to a California federal district court that it did not have to follow this law because of its status as a National Bank. CRL, joined by AARP, National Consumer Law Center, National Association of Consumer Advocates...