Apple set to roll out new 'Buy Now Pay Later' feature to all its users - but experts warn unregulated industry could leave Gen Z in debt

Source
Neirin Gray Desai | Daily Mail
In materials promoting the new service, Apple says Apple Pay Later was 'designed with users' financial health in mind'. But advocates are skeptical. 'The very use of the product itself does lead to a decline in financial health,' Nadine Chabrier, senior policy counsel at the Center for Responsible Lending, told DailyMail.com.

BNPL, EWA bills surface at House hearing

Source
Caitlin Mullen | Payments Dive
Mitria Spotser, vice president and director of federal policy at the Center for Responsible Lending, called for more regulations with regard to EWA and BNPL. “If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and it quacks like a duck, it’s probably a duck,” she said. “Buy now, pay later, early wage access – they look, act and function...

Redlining Update Faces Legal Risks Despite Bank-Friendly Changes

Source
Evan Weinberger | Bloomberg Law
Under the current CRA rules, around 90% of banks receive a “satisfactory” grade and 10% receive “outstanding” marks, the National Community Reinvestment Coalition estimated in a comment letter to the agencies. A “needs to improve” or “substantial noncompliance” score is exceedingly rare. “It was pretty easy to get a pass on CRA exams,” said Mitria Spotser, federal policy director at...

New report paints a bleak picture of how North Carolina's court system holds many of the state's poorest people accountable

Source
Bill O'Neil | WXII
The Center for Responsible Lending helped write the report. The group's spokesperson, Rochelle Sparko, said they're urging judges to waive civil penalties for those unable to pay them. "It is our position that this is a far better outcome for folks who truly are indigent, then converting fines and fees to a civil judgment largely because of those long term...

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s funding is constitutional

Source
Mitria Wilson-Spotser | The Washington Post
In his Oct. 1 op-ed, “Diminish Congress’s taste for diminishment,” George F. Will urged the Supreme Court to affirm a decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit that invalidated funding for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). This decision is contradicted by constitutional text, historical practice and judicial precedent, including recent rulings by the 2nd Circuit...

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau funding’s is constitutional

Source
Washington Post Letters to the Editor
George F. Will argued that the Supreme Court should hold the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s funding unconstitutional to “strengthen Congress.” This is an Orwellian claim if ever there were one, because such a decision would strip Congress of a power it has exercised since the nation’s founding.

Consumer advocates warn about consequences of weakening the CFPB

Source
Scott Horsley, Lauren Hodges, William Troop | NPR
HORSLEY: You know, the CFPB is popular with the public. Polls show Democrats and Republicans alike feel it's useful to have an agency that's looking out for them in their dealings with often much more sophisticated financial institutions. Over the years, the bureau has recovered some $17 billion for consumers. It's gone after not only predatory lenders, but debt collectors...

Consumer Protection Agency Fights For Its Life In Supreme Court Case

Source
Rachel Witkowski, Caren Weiner | Forbes
“The Supreme Court has a choice in its ruling: it can side with judicial precedent, historical practice, common sense, and text of the Constitution—or it can side with payday lenders and economic chaos,” said Michael Calhoun, president of the Center for Responsible Lending, one of the groups represented at the rally.